Independent Birth of Organisms. A New Theory that Distinct Organisms Arose Independently from the Primordial Pond, Showing that Evolutionary Theories are Fundamentally Incorrect Review

Average Reviews:

(More customer reviews)Are you looking to buy Independent Birth of Organisms. A New Theory that Distinct Organisms Arose Independently from the Primordial Pond, Showing that Evolutionary Theories are Fundamentally Incorrect? Here is the right place to find the great deals. we can offer discounts of up to 90% on Independent Birth of Organisms. A New Theory that Distinct Organisms Arose Independently from the Primordial Pond, Showing that Evolutionary Theories are Fundamentally Incorrect. Check out the link below:

>> Click Here to See Compare Prices and Get the Best Offers

Independent Birth of Organisms. A New Theory that Distinct Organisms Arose Independently from the Primordial Pond, Showing that Evolutionary Theories are Fundamentally Incorrect ReviewDr. Senapathy presents a bold, controversial, and very provocative thesis about the origin and diversity of life in an exceptionally lucid style. Far from being a creationist, Senapathy's view of the origin of life is very strictly materialistic, and genuinely original.
Senapathy's theory can be taken in two parts: an explanation for the origin of life, and an explanation for the diversification of life. These two parts form a coherent whole united by the basic thesis that life originated by random combinations and recombinations of genetic material in a primordial genetic soup, with only (relatively) slight subsequent modification of the resulting organisms. The style meets the layman where he is, but does not leave him there, educating the reader by painless, even enjoyable, degrees into an understanding of the issues involved in such a theory.
One aspect of Senapathy's theory which particularly intrigues me is that it is a remarkable example of lateral thinking (something I'm not all that good at and therefore admire all the more), which, incidentally, further distinguishes Senapathy from creationists. As I understand it, creationism has tried to discard the following assumption: if organisms are morphologically parallel, they must be genetically related. Rejecting that can be pretty difficult to defend, to say the least, when the evidence is closely examined. Senapathy differs from creationists in that he accepts that all organisms are genetically related, and that this relationship is manifest in morphological similarity, but he rejects a different assumption. The assumption is this: if organisms are genetically related, they must have a common ancestor. Senapathy demonstrates (brilliantly, it seems to me) that organisms can be genetically related without a common ancestor and indeed must be related without a common ancestor because they are genetically related and at the same time genetically unrelated in a way that defies the scenario of common descent.
This theory is not, and does not pretend to be, Gospel truth; as with all scientific theories, it will be subject to change. The book does make a strong case, however that this is to date the explanation for the diversification of life best supported by scientific data. More involved technical debates and discussions have already begun subsequent to the publication of this book, and will be necessary to flesh out the theory in satisfying detail for specialists. But as a seminal work, this book is first rate.Independent Birth of Organisms. A New Theory that Distinct Organisms Arose Independently from the Primordial Pond, Showing that Evolutionary Theories are Fundamentally Incorrect OverviewThe book describes a new theory on the origin anddiversity of organisms on earth.It shows that distinct organismsarose independently from the primordial pond from a common pool ofgenes, thereby explaining both the commonality and the distinctionsamong the organisms living on earth.This is the first ever writtenbook to explain the origins and diversity of life on earthwithoutevolution.Modern computer power and new insights into moleculargenetics show that primordial chemical compounds spontaneouslycombined into the genomes for multitudes of multicellular masseshundreds of millions of years of ago.Those that were meaninglessperished instantly, but the many organisms coded by viable genomessimply flowered, swam, walked, or flew away from the primordial pond in essentially the same forms that we know today.

Want to learn more information about Independent Birth of Organisms. A New Theory that Distinct Organisms Arose Independently from the Primordial Pond, Showing that Evolutionary Theories are Fundamentally Incorrect?

>> Click Here to See All Customer Reviews & Ratings Now